Vista RC2 doesn't like samba-3.0.10+ or 3.0.22+
idra at samba.org
Fri Oct 13 21:23:00 GMT 2006
On Fri, 2006-10-13 at 12:07 +1300, Jason Haar wrote:
> Jeremy Allison wrote:
> > I think Volker added a fix for something like this into the SAMBA_3_0
> > source tree. Are the servers in a AD domain ?
> No they are "server = DOMAIN" even though we are fully AD Win2K3. We had
> a cow of a time getting Samba (specifically winbind) to work reliably
> under "server = ADS" and have gone back to DOMAIN. Other than this we
> really haven't lost any functionality...
Latest samba will use ADS mode against AD servers even if you set
security = DOMAIN
> > If so that would explain why the alias entry makes a difference, with
> > the primary name they're using krb5 (which Volker added a fix for)
> > with the alias name they're using NTLM.
> Hmm - that doesn't follow if we are DOMAIN does it? It certainly could
> be that the servers showing this problem have been ADS members earlier
> before we downgraded them back to DOMAIN - could that cause some
> ADS-calls to carry over?
More information about the samba-technical