management of Samba4

Andrew Bartlett abartlet at samba.org
Fri Jun 3 14:36:19 GMT 2005


On Sat, 2005-06-04 at 00:27 +1000, Andrew Tridgell wrote:
>  > You don't necessarily need to use Samba code.
>  > Just Samba's IDL.  The monitoring app could
>  > write it's own [un]marhsllaing routines based
>  > on Samba's IDL.
> 
> Another approach would be to declare that ejs scripts using smbscript
> can be any license you like. 

The problem I have here is the we are supplying both the language (a
nice clear line) and what elsewhere would be the 'modules'.  I'm not
comfortable that there is a distinction between C code using an
interface and ejs code using it via a small abstraction.

Andrew Bartlett

-- 
Andrew Bartlett                                http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team           http://samba.org
Student Network Administrator, Hawker College  http://hawkerc.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/attachments/20050604/73f97fee/attachment.bin


More information about the samba-technical mailing list