management of Samba4
abartlet at samba.org
Fri Jun 3 14:36:19 GMT 2005
On Sat, 2005-06-04 at 00:27 +1000, Andrew Tridgell wrote:
> > You don't necessarily need to use Samba code.
> > Just Samba's IDL. The monitoring app could
> > write it's own [un]marhsllaing routines based
> > on Samba's IDL.
> Another approach would be to declare that ejs scripts using smbscript
> can be any license you like.
The problem I have here is the we are supplying both the language (a
nice clear line) and what elsewhere would be the 'modules'. I'm not
comfortable that there is a distinction between C code using an
interface and ejs code using it via a small abstraction.
Andrew Bartlett http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org
Student Network Administrator, Hawker College http://hawkerc.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/attachments/20050604/73f97fee/attachment.bin
More information about the samba-technical