exclusive oplock left process
Niso Moyal
nmoyal at neomagic.com
Wed Jun 30 16:21:48 GMT 2004
I'm using samba version 2.26 in my network. Most of the clients are windows
Xp pro(aproc 25 users). 2 weeks ago users started to complain about slow
connection to SMB shares and in many cases XP needed reboot because it got
freeze for 5-6 minutes.
I have checked samba logs and find out that this error message is repeating
in all clients log. "exclusive oplock left process ***" I also looked in
some newsgroups and noticed that I'm not alone with this problem. My
question is if some one got this problem fix.
Here is one post that I found that describe exactly what is going on in my
network.
--
From: <UrsRau <at> aol.com>
Subject: 2.2.8 slows down to a crawl within a few days
Newsgroups: gmane.network.samba.general
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2003 05:02:41 -0400
We have been using samba for years now and are generally very happy.
But since a recent upgrade to 2.2.8 we have seen samba slowing down
periodically to a crawl every 2 or 3 days. BTW the start of these problems
coincided with the upgrade to samba 2.2.8 and a partial cabling upgrade to
100 MBit, which also coincided with the introduction of the first Win XP
Pro
machines to our LAN. ;-(
We have about twenty users logged in at any one time and when it comes
to
"the crawl", every two or three days, then everything on the samba server
gets extremely slow. Documents that ordinarily open up inside 5-10
seconds
take in excess of 5 minutes .... People start restarting their PCs and form
then on my phone starts ringing no end
We appear to be having lots of oplock timing out issues. It's probably best
if I don't say too much, except that we have set the "oplock break wait
time
= 20" with no improvement, but let the logfile speak:
/var/log/samba/log.smbd
[2003/03/26 09:31:48, 0] smbd/oplock.c:request_oplock_break(1011)
request_oplock_break: no response received to oplock break request to
pid
3092
3 on port 33142 for dev = 815, inode = 32781, file_id = 1
[2003/03/26 09:31:48, 0] smbd/open.c:open_mode_check(651)
open_mode_check: exlusive oplock left by process 30923 after break !
For
file
logon.bat, dev = 815, inode = 32781. Deleting it to continue...
[2003/03/26 09:31:48, 0] smbd/open.c:open_mode_check(655)
open_mode_check: Existent process 30923 left active oplock.
[2003/03/26 09:32:01, 0] smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(824)
oplock_break: no break received from client within 30 seconds.
oplock_break failed for file logon.bat (dev = 815, inode = 32781, file_id
= 1)
.
[2003/03/26 09:32:01, 0] smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(869)
oplock_break: client failure in oplock break in file logon.bat
[2003/03/26 09:32:01, 0] tdb/tdbutil.c:tdb_log(531)
tdb(/var/cache/samba/locking.tdb): tdb_lock failed on list 4 ltype=1
(Resource
deadlock avoided)
[2003/03/26 09:32:01, 0] smbd/oplock.c:remove_oplock(272)
remove_oplock: failed to lock share entry for file logon.bat
[2003/03/26 09:32:01, 0] tdb/tdbutil.c:tdb_log(531)
What's not shown in the samba logs is the msg which shows up in
/var/log/messages
kernel: lease timed out
in the middle of the oplock_break msgs which tends to follow the
"exclusive
oplock left by active process" message
I have also noticed that I have lots of "stale user sessions". What I mean
is that according to "smbstatus -b" users, although logged out have up to
twenty or more sessions open from the same machine. (this was especially
bad
for win xp pro machines)
Any hints on how to track this down? Is this likely a hardware (i.e. cabling
or nic), a samba software, or a client side (i.e. win xp pro) issue? Or is
it a combination of any of these three? How would you go about clearing
up
an error happening about every two days when you can't really impact any
of
the 20 users doing it?
More information about the samba-technical
mailing list