Andrew Bartlett, Q about what you wrote... -> Re: todo list

[Gerald (Jerry) Carter]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Michael Lueck wrote:
| Andrew Bartlett wrote:
|
|  >  - Netlogon server works:
|
|>    - The existing Netlogon server is just enough to get WinXP to log
|> in.  We need torture tests written, and code fixed on that basis.
|
|
| Hi Andrew, or other Samba experts.
|
| Based on the above, it leads me to think there is much XP
| would like to issue / call on a Samba server which Samba does
| not have code to respond to. Does that visibly hinder XP, or is
| it just under the covers things which are hindered?
|
| If one were considering rolling out several thousand
| Windows boxes to be clients in Samba 3.0.5 PDC's and both Win2K
| and WinXP were options, based on what Samba is today would
| the suggestion be to stick to Win2K?
|
| TIA for any input towards that very question.

Andrew's comments were about the progress tridge has made
in Samba 4 wrt to being an AD DC.  Samba 3 has no problems
with being an nt4 DC for all MS clients (including 2003).



cheers, jerry
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------
Alleviating the pain of Windows(tm)      ------- http://www.samba.org
GnuPG Key                ----- http://www.plainjoe.org/gpg_public.asc
"If we're adding to the noise, turn off this song"--Switchfoot (2003)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFBFixEIR7qMdg1EfYRAj+8AKDPBdVMl09Ys3HRHW5SheM5SoZNdgCggihu
VS4o5IAriJYYsDGBqVLeaHU=
=bVxy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----