Is there interst in ssl these days?
abartlet at pcug.org.au
Fri Nov 9 05:31:05 GMT 2001
Jay Ts wrote:
> Gerald Carter wrote:
> > Someone want to make a proposal for removeing --with-ssl
> > in 3.0 and post it to the main list and see what the reaction is?
> How about simply asking if anyone is using it?
> This thread was started off (offlist, actually) by me asking David
> Collier-Brown if he thought it was important to cover SSL in Using
> Samba. I'm quite surprised it quickly turned into a discussion about
> whether the feature should be dropped! :-)
> If it were up to me, I wouldn't remove support for much of
> anything without at least letting a few major versions go
> by containing a prominent warning that the feature may disappear,
> and thus allowing anyone who is depending on it to say something.
Its not quite that desperate a situation if we kill it, becouse it
doesn't do much that sslwrapper can't do. (Then you just run it from
Andrew Bartlett abartlet at pcug.org.au
Samba Team member, Build Farm maintainer abartlet at samba.org
Student Network Administrator, Hawker College abartlet at hawkerc.net
http://samba.org http://build.samba.org http://hawkerc.net
More information about the samba-technical