I think MS just did us (and themselves) a disservice.
armand.welsh at sscims.com
Tue Jan 9 23:24:39 GMT 2001
but what about terminal server? How does it handle this situation? What
would need to be done to have samba do the same?
-> -----Original Message-----
-> From: Christopher R. Hertel [mailto:crh at nts.umn.edu]
-> Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2001 3:18 PM
-> To: Francois Gouget
-> Cc: samba-technical at samba.org
-> Subject: Re: I think MS just did us (and themselves) a disservice.
-> > Also, despite what they say, I suspect it's not for
-> security reasons
-> > but truely because of _bad_ design. Or at least it must be
-> simpler for
-> > them to handle it that way.
-> If I read this correctly, what it does is prevent separate users on a
-> multi-user system from accessing the same NT service. This
-> puts a kink
-> into the utility of, say, libsmbclient.
-> Because there are effectively no multi-user Windows OSes,
-> this isn't a
-> problem from MS's point of view.
-> Am I reading that right?
-> Chris -)-----
-> Christopher R. Hertel -)----- University
-> of Minnesota
-> crh at nts.umn.edu Networking and
-> Telecommunications Services
-> Ideals are like stars; you will not succeed in touching them
-> with your hands...you choose them as your guides, and following
-> them you will reach your destiny. --Carl Schultz
More information about the samba-technical