I think MS just did us (and themselves) a disservice.

[Welsh, Armand]

but what about terminal server?  How does it handle this situation?  What
would need to be done to have samba do the same?

-> -----Original Message-----
-> From: Christopher R. Hertel [mailto:crh at nts.umn.edu]
-> Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2001 3:18 PM
-> To: Francois Gouget
-> Cc: samba-technical at samba.org
-> Subject: Re: I think MS just did us (and themselves) a disservice.
-> 
-> 
-> >    Also, despite what they say, I suspect it's not for 
-> security reasons
-> > but truely because of _bad_ design. Or at least it must be 
-> simpler for
-> > them to handle it that way.
-> 
-> If I read this correctly, what it does is prevent separate users on a
-> multi-user system from accessing the same NT service.  This 
-> puts a kink
-> into the utility of, say, libsmbclient. 
-> 
-> Because there are effectively no multi-user Windows OSes, 
-> this isn't a 
-> problem from MS's point of view.
-> 
-> Am I reading that right?
-> 
-> Chris -)-----
-> 
-> -- 
-> Christopher R. Hertel -)-----                   University 
-> of Minnesota
-> crh at nts.umn.edu              Networking and 
-> Telecommunications Services
-> 
->     Ideals are like stars; you will not succeed in touching them
->     with your hands...you choose them as your guides, and following
->     them you will reach your destiny.  --Carl Schultz
-> 
->