Solaris 2.6 and latest NTDOM code

Jeremy Allison jallison at
Thu Jun 25 20:54:32 GMT 1998

Christopher R. Hertel wrote:
> I've looked it over.  I don't *see* anything but that doesn't mean much.
> The change I've made so far is to replace the linked list with a binary
> tree.  As part of that, I did change the structure of the nmbd_record.
> Jeremy, is there any chance that someone has made assumptions about this
> structure in the NTDOM code?

I don't think so. This may be some unfortunate memory corruption
that we have had for a time.

Alternatively it could be a new one introduced to nmbd.
Another check would be to test the HEAD branch smbd with
the 1.9.18 branch nmbd to see if the problem doesn't occur


Buying an operating system without source is like buying
a self-assembly Space Shuttle with no instructions.

More information about the samba-ntdom mailing list