Solaris 2.6 and latest NTDOM code

[Jeremy Allison]

Christopher R. Hertel wrote:
> 
> I've looked it over.  I don't *see* anything but that doesn't mean much.
> The change I've made so far is to replace the linked list with a binary
> tree.  As part of that, I did change the structure of the nmbd_record.
> Jeremy, is there any chance that someone has made assumptions about this
> structure in the NTDOM code?
> 

I don't think so. This may be some unfortunate memory corruption
that we have had for a time.

Alternatively it could be a new one introduced to nmbd.
Another check would be to test the HEAD branch smbd with
the 1.9.18 branch nmbd to see if the problem doesn't occur
there.

Jeremy.

-- 
--------------------------------------------------------
Buying an operating system without source is like buying
a self-assembly Space Shuttle with no instructions.
--------------------------------------------------------