Rsync with OS X 10.3
macuserfr at free.fr
Thu Jan 22 09:36:43 GMT 2009
You may try this patch ( http://email@example.com/msg23276.html
) instead of the one I gave you about colon to slash conversion. You
may not see the difference but it's supposed to use less memory and
should be as fast as the other patch.
For the Backup Bouncer test, which rsync arguments did you use?
You should be using -X for keeping resource fork and -H for hard
links. If you ran rsync without arguments, your test is normal.
Here I explain what can not be OK on the bb test in Panther's patched
And here we have a bb test OK for hardlinks and resource-fork with
10.3 patch http://firstname.lastname@example.org/msg20764.html
More information about the rsync