[clug] GFS - add some more abstraction [SEC=PERSONAL]

[Daniel Pittman]

"Roppola, Antti" <Antti.Roppola at daff.gov.au> writes:
> Daniel Pittman wrote:
>
>>> It seems a bit of overkill if one just wants a shared filesystem on a
>>> small private network.
>
>> Absolutely.  I can't imagine why GFS would look attractive in that
>> scenario.
>
> There was a suggestion it wasn't much more involved than "mount -t gfs".
>
> Well it sure doesn't look attractive for my application. In fact the more I
> read, the less attractive it became.
>
> At least I now know more about GFS than I did a week ago. :o)

Heh.  Always nice.  So, in essence, "the label on the can was misleading". :)

        Daniel

-- 
✣ Daniel Pittman            ✉ daniel at rimspace.net            ☎ +61 401 155 707
               ♽ made with 100 percent post-consumer electrons