[clug] GFS - add some more abstraction [SEC=PERSONAL]
daniel at rimspace.net
Wed Mar 31 00:34:06 MDT 2010
"Roppola, Antti" <Antti.Roppola at daff.gov.au> writes:
> Daniel Pittman wrote:
>>> It seems a bit of overkill if one just wants a shared filesystem on a
>>> small private network.
>> Absolutely. I can't imagine why GFS would look attractive in that
> There was a suggestion it wasn't much more involved than "mount -t gfs".
> Well it sure doesn't look attractive for my application. In fact the more I
> read, the less attractive it became.
> At least I now know more about GFS than I did a week ago. :o)
Heh. Always nice. So, in essence, "the label on the can was misleading". :)
✣ Daniel Pittman ✉ daniel at rimspace.net ☎ +61 401 155 707
♽ made with 100 percent post-consumer electrons
More information about the linux