[clug] GFS - add some more abstraction [SEC=PERSONAL]

[Roppola, Antti]

Daniel Pittman wrote:

>> It seems a bit of overkill if one just wants a shared filesystem on a

>> small private network.

>Absolutely.  I can't imagine why GFS would look attractive in that
scenario.

There was a suggestion it wasn't much more involved than "mount -t gfs".

Well it sure doesn't look attractive for my application. In fact the
more I read, the less attractive it became.

At least I now know more about GFS than I did a week ago. :o)

Antti


------
IMPORTANT - This email and any attachments have been issued by the Australian Government Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry (DAFF).  The material transmitted is for the use of the intended recipient only and may contain confidential, legally privileged, copyright or personal information.  You should not copy, use or disclose it without authorisation from DAFF.  It is your responsibility to check any attachments for viruses and defects before opening or forwarding them.

If you are not an intended recipient, please contact the sender of this email at once by return email and then delete both messages.  Unintended recipients must not copy, use, disclose, rely on or publish this email or attachments.  DAFF is not liable for any loss or damage resulting from unauthorised use or dissemination of, or any reliance on, this email or attachments. 

If you have received this e-mail as part of a valid mailing list and no longer want to receive a message such as this one, advise the sender by return e-mail accordingly.

This notice should not be deleted or altered.


------