testing a signed message..
matt at mh.dropbear.id.au
Fri Feb 28 08:14:09 EST 2003
Michael James (michael at james.st) wrote:
> Maybe I should, but even then your attachment "untitled.7",
> would have to be dealt with outside the email.
Out of curiosity, what the heck are you on about?
Rob's mail consisted of two parts, a text/plain and an
Where you get this "untitled.7" thing from, I really have no idea.
Sounds like your MUA is extremely broken, or at least misconfigured.
(particularly with it spewing lots of files across your desktop as you
> It would be more convenient if it was attached
> to the email in a signature, it's not that much text.
Inline PGP was the way before MIME became standardised. It poses a few
problems easily rectified using MIME, hence why the proposed standard is
using MIME instead. That being said, a friend who also used a Mac also
enjoyed complaining loud and strong about his broken MUA being unable to
properly handle PGP/MIME attachments. Perhaps that platform just needs
a decent MUA written for it?
Anyone feel like a McMutt for breakfast? ;)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/linux/attachments/20030228/7090e4e9/attachment.bin
More information about the linux