[jcifs] Re: davenport
Heupink, Mourik Jan C.
Heupink at INTECH.UNU.EDU
Mon Feb 9 23:10:21 GMT 2004
Basically, I need to apologise....
The problem is NOT jcifs related at all. I see exactly the same machines via
jcifs as in the network neighbourhood, so there is ABSOLUTELY NOTHING wrong
with jcifs. Stupid me, stupid me.
The problem is that I usually use unc's, and don't browse the network
neighbourhood so much... therefore I never noticed that some machines didn't
Sorry, and thanks for thinking about it anyway...
From: Christopher R. Hertel
To: Michael B Allen
Cc: eglass1 at comcast.net; jcifs at lists.samba.org; mourik jan c heupink
Sent: 2/9/04 9:48 PM
Subject: Re: [jcifs] Re: davenport
Michael B Allen wrote:
> eglass1 at comcast.net said:
> > Mike/All,
> > I had the question below raised regarding browsing servers, and
> > had probably been addressed previously; basically, some servers
> > up in what amounts to a listFiles() on a workgroup. The servers can
> > contacted directly, etc. I'm guessing there is a simple
> > just can't think of one off the top of my head. Anybody?
> This could be a lot of things. NetServerEnum is limited to 15 ASCII
> characters. It may be that the FQDN is being used and is different
> the NetBIOS name. If the list of server names is too big to fit in the
> NetServerEnum response (possibly because there are lots of comments)
> will be truncated. Or if the user takes a capture  and confirms
> the entries of interest are indeed returned then it is a bug in jCIFS.
I would want to see the output of 'smbclient -L' directed at the same
Most likely, the missing entries are simply not in the browse list being
retrieved. This can happen for several reasons, some of which are in
response, above. More likely, however, is that there's a simple
- The server isn't announcing itself.
- The announcement hasn't gotten to all of the LMBs yet.
- You're contacting a backup browser instead of the LMB and it hasn't
synced with the LMB recently.
- There are Windows boxes with NetBIOS bound to NetBEUI or NWLink on the
and these are causing browse service problems.
The question is: What evidence is there that other nodes *can* see the
"missing" nodes? It's only a jCIFS problem if the "missing" servers can
seen by other nodes on the same LAN.
"Implementing CIFS - the Common Internet FileSystem" ISBN: 013047116X
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)----- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)----- ubiqx development,
ubiqx Team -- http://www.ubiqx.org/ -)----- crh at ubiqx.mn.org
OnLineBook -- http://ubiqx.org/cifs/ -)----- crh at ubiqx.org
More information about the jcifs