[distcc] distcc & gcc3.3
mbp at sourcefrog.net
Wed Apr 12 04:31:06 GMT 2006
On 12/04/2006, at 2:27 PM, Dan Kegel wrote:
> On 4/11/06, Martin Pool <mbp at sourcefrog.net> wrote:
>>> Googling I've found that there have been similar
>>> inquiries (please see below). Can this problem be
>>> fixed by simply adding a compiler flag?
>> I think fixing it requires a patch to gcc.
> This is described here, isn't it?
> (since the anchor is missing now, scroll down to "gdb can't find
> source files").
> If so, it's nice that there's a gcc patch, but we'd have to port it
> to all
> the versions of gcc we need. Easier, I think, to patch distcc,
> as described in the distcc FAQ. I reposted that patch as part of the
> "eight little patches" thread,
> and I think it's worth including in mainline distcc. I certainly
> use it.
> - Dan
Does that give you byte-for-byte identical output?
More information about the distcc