[distcc] distcc & gcc3.3

[Martin Pool]

On 12/04/2006, at 2:27 PM, Dan Kegel wrote:

> On 4/11/06, Martin Pool <mbp at sourcefrog.net> wrote:
>>> Googling I've found that there have been similar
>>> inquiries (please see below). Can this problem be
>>> fixed by simply adding a compiler flag?
>>>
>>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-01/msg01341.html
>>> http://lists.samba.org/archive/distcc/2003q2/000997.html
>>
>> I think fixing it requires a patch to gcc.
>
> This is described here, isn't it?
> http://distcc.samba.org/faq.html#gdb
> (since the anchor is missing now, scroll down to "gdb can't find  
> source files").
>
> If so, it's nice that there's a gcc patch, but we'd have to port it  
> to all
> the versions of gcc we need.  Easier, I think, to patch distcc,
> as described in the distcc FAQ.  I reposted that patch as part of the
> "eight little patches" thread,
> http://kegel.com/distcc/2006-03-28/01-distcc-gdb-20051210.patch
> and I think it's worth including in mainline distcc.  I certainly  
> use it.
> - Dan

Does that give you byte-for-byte identical output?

-- 
Martin