[distcc] distcc & gcc3.3
dank at kegel.com
Tue Apr 18 03:45:32 GMT 2006
On 4/12/06, Martin Pool <mbp at sourcefrog.net> wrote:
> > and I think it's worth including in mainline distcc.
> Does that give you byte-for-byte identical output?
In what sense?
md5sum of the .o's? It can't be that,
since otherwise the patch would be a no-op.
md5sum of the generated opcodes? Probably;
I haven't checked. But I do compile metric boatloads of
code with this patch every day, and we haven't seen
any regression tests fail as a result.
If you define your criterion a bit more closely, I'll try to
see if the patch satisfies it.
More information about the distcc