[distcc] distcc & gcc3.3

[Dan Kegel]

On 4/12/06, Martin Pool <mbp at sourcefrog.net> wrote:
> http://kegel.com/distcc/2006-03-28/01-distcc-gdb-20051210.patch
> > and I think it's worth including in mainline distcc.
>
> Does that give you byte-for-byte identical output?

In what sense?

md5sum of the .o's?  It can't be that,
since otherwise the patch would be a no-op.

md5sum of the generated opcodes?  Probably;
I haven't checked.  But I do compile metric boatloads of
code with this patch every day, and we haven't seen
any regression tests fail as a result.

If you define your criterion a bit more closely, I'll try to
see if the patch satisfies it.
- Dan