[distcc] Eight little patches for distcc.
dank at kegel.com
Wed Apr 12 04:17:44 GMT 2006
On 4/10/06, Michael Donohue <michael.donohue at gmail.com> wrote:
> I submitted an improved randomized algorithm a while back:
> It requires fewer probes of the locks to find a successful host, and allows
> some degree of load balancing based on the number of slots available.
We benchmarked it. It was a bit slower than the one I selected,
believe it or not.
I can explain why if you're curious. (I'd have to think back and ask Dongmin,
who did the benchmarking.)
Wine for Windows ISVs: http://kegel.com/wine/isv
More information about the distcc