[distcc] Eight little patches for distcc.

[Dan Kegel]

On 4/10/06, Michael Donohue <michael.donohue at gmail.com> wrote:
> I submitted an improved randomized algorithm a while back:
>  http://lists.samba.org/archive/distcc/2005q1/002957.html
>
>  It requires fewer probes of the locks to find a successful host, and allows
> some degree of load balancing based on the number of slots available.

We benchmarked it.  It was a bit slower than the one I selected,
believe it or not.
I can explain why if you're curious.  (I'd have to think back and ask Dongmin,
who did the benchmarking.)
- Dan

--
Wine for Windows ISVs: http://kegel.com/wine/isv