[distcc] Status of distcc-zeroconf

[Martin Pool]

On Thu, 25 Nov 2004 17:56:14 +0100, Lennart Poettering > Support for
mDNS/DNS-SD doesn't contradict support for SLP. You're not
> required to make use of zeroconf based on DNS-SD if you don't want
> to. I am planning to implement zeroconf support by adding a special
> pseudo hostname like "+zeroconf" or something like this for
> DISTCC_HOSTS. Set it and use zeroconf or don't set it and don't use
> it. It's that easy. If someone should implement for SLP based zeroconf
> stuff he might want to add another pseudo hostname, perhaps "+slp" or
> something like that.
> > OK.  What are the advantages of howl compared to others?
> 
> It's the only implementation of mDNS/DNS-SD that is sufficently stable
> and GPL-compatible. In addition it is the only implementation that is
> currently available in Debian.

OK, that all sounds good to me.

-- 
Martin