[distcc] [PATCH] Adding host list randomization

[Tim Potter]

On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 04:51:38PM -0700, Daniel Kegel wrote:

> Martin Pool wrote:
> >Thank you for the patch.  It looks OK to me, except that I am not sure
> >if it should be an option specified in that way.  I wonder if it
> >should always be on?  Or at least, if it should always be on until we
> >have some kind of automatic weighting of faster machines.
> 
> People are used to the first machine being hit first, aren't they?
> We figured making it optional would be less disruption.
> Whatever you think is best is ok with us.

How about keeping the first machine still being hit first but then
randomize the remaining hosts?


Tim.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/distcc/attachments/20040529/82bdea8b/attachment.bin