[distcc] [PATCH] Adding host list randomization
Dan Kegel
dank at kegel.com
Fri May 28 23:46:53 GMT 2004
Tim Potter wrote:
> On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 04:51:38PM -0700, Daniel Kegel wrote:
>
>
>>Martin Pool wrote:
>>
>>>Thank you for the patch. It looks OK to me, except that I am not sure
>>>if it should be an option specified in that way. I wonder if it
>>>should always be on? Or at least, if it should always be on until we
>>>have some kind of automatic weighting of faster machines.
>>
>>People are used to the first machine being hit first, aren't they?
>>We figured making it optional would be less disruption.
>>Whatever you think is best is ok with us.
>
>
> How about keeping the first machine still being hit first but then
> randomize the remaining hosts?
We could randomize all the hosts that show up
after the --randomize keyword, but I'm not sure
that degree of control is really needed.
- Dan
--
My technical stuff: http://kegel.com
My politics: see http://www.misleader.org for examples of why I'm for regime change
More information about the distcc
mailing list