[cifs-protocol] FW: FW: Inconsistencies in ad-schema docs and text files SRX090109601490

[Andrew Bartlett]

On Mon, 2010-01-11 at 20:51 +0000, Hongwei Sun wrote:
> Andrew,
> 
>   At this moment, I am now going through the diff reports pointed by Tridge.   
> 
>   For adminDescription and adminDisplayName,  it looks like that they are already included in the schema file (MS-AD_Schema_2K8_R2_Attributes.txt).  Have I missed something ? 

Sure, I'm not asking for their definitions, but for them to be filled
with the appropriate data for each schema object.  (otherwise we cannot
reconstruct what is visible on LDAP)

Andrew Bartlett

-- 
Andrew Bartlett                                http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team           http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Cisco Inc.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 190 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/cifs-protocol/attachments/20100112/d8f4a87a/attachment.pgp>