[cifs-protocol] FW: FW: Inconsistencies in ad-schema docs and text files SRX090109601490

Andrew Bartlett abartlet at samba.org
Mon Jan 11 15:21:55 MST 2010

On Mon, 2010-01-11 at 20:51 +0000, Hongwei Sun wrote:
> Andrew,
>   At this moment, I am now going through the diff reports pointed by Tridge.   
>   For adminDescription and adminDisplayName,  it looks like that they are already included in the schema file (MS-AD_Schema_2K8_R2_Attributes.txt).  Have I missed something ? 

Sure, I'm not asking for their definitions, but for them to be filled
with the appropriate data for each schema object.  (otherwise we cannot
reconstruct what is visible on LDAP)

Andrew Bartlett

Andrew Bartlett                                http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team           http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Cisco Inc.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 190 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/cifs-protocol/attachments/20100112/d8f4a87a/attachment.pgp>

More information about the cifs-protocol mailing list