[cifs-protocol] Correction, assistance request: MS-DRSR Partial
Sebastian.Canevari at microsoft.com
Wed Jul 2 19:10:18 GMT 2008
Thanks for your question!
I'll be reviewing the information and I will let you know about my findings as soon as I have news.
Support Escalation Engineer, US-CSS DSC PROTOCOL TEAM
7100 N Hwy 161, Irving, TX - 75039
"Las Colinas - LC2"
Tel: +1 469 775 7849
e-mail: sebastc at microsoft.com
From: cifs-protocol-bounces+sebastc=microsoft.com at cifs.org [mailto:cifs-protocol-bounces+sebastc=microsoft.com at cifs.org] On Behalf Of Stefan (metze) Metzmacher
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2008 6:24 AM
To: Interoperability Documentation Help; pfif at tridgell.net; cifs-protocol at samba.org
Subject: [cifs-protocol] Correction, assistance request: MS-DRSR Partial Attribute Set
I was testing the behavior of the pPartialAttrSet and pPartialAttrSetEx members of DRS_MSG_GETCHGREQ_V8.
Please document what the difference between two is!
Is it necessary to pass the PrefixTableDest, when passing pPartialAttrSet and/or pPartialAttrSet? What happens when the PrefixTableDest is missing?
Testing shows that the pPartialAttrSet is ignored if DRS_WRIT_REP is set in ulFlags.
Is it somehow possible to replicate just the "unicodePwd" attribute?
If I skip the DRS_WRIT_REP flag I'm getting only empty attribute values.
If I add the DRS_WRIT_REP I'm getting all attributes.
Stefan Metzmacher - Samba Team
More information about the cifs-protocol