Is this a real memory leak?

[Ferenc Wágner]

Dear Samba developers,

Please take a look at the following patch, taken from
https://github.com/balabit-deps/balabit-os-8-samba/commit/5f46ae6282db1457b8ef8bbfb4e97eb4aadd55b4:

>From 5f46ae6282db1457b8ef8bbfb4e97eb4aadd55b4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Balazs Scheidler <bazsi at balabit.hu>
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 11:34:43 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] nsswitch/libwbclient: fixed a memory leak in
 wbcAuthenticateUserEx

(cherry picked from commit zorp-os-5.0 / f0e88410bd2528517910f780d71e63f8effb91ef)
---
 nsswitch/libwbclient/wbc_pam.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/nsswitch/libwbclient/wbc_pam.c b/nsswitch/libwbclient/wbc_pam.c
index e4cd2963..b16c9424 100644
--- a/nsswitch/libwbclient/wbc_pam.c
+++ b/nsswitch/libwbclient/wbc_pam.c
@@ -415,6 +415,7 @@ wbcErr wbcCtxAuthenticateUserEx(struct wbcContext *ctx,
                                 params->domain_name,
                                 sep_response.data.info.winbind_separator,
                                 params->account_name);
+                       winbindd_free_response(&sep_response);
                } else {
                        strncpy(request.data.auth.user,
                                params->account_name,

Do you agree that this patches an actual memory leak?  If so, would you
please consider taking it?
-- 
Thanks,
Feri.