Transactions into ldb js?

[Andrew Bartlett]

On Wed, 2005-12-28 at 21:41 +1100, tridge at samba.org wrote:
> Simo,
> 
>  > On Tue, 2005-12-27 at 20:23 +1100, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
>  > > Should we push transactions up into the ldb js layer?
>  > 
>  > Yes we should, as we may need that later when doing some complex and
>  > critical tree operation via the swat2 interface.
> 
> I added transactions to the ejs interface in rev 11474 a couple of months ago:
> 
>   http://build.samba.org/?function=diff;tree=samba4;date=1130913671;author=tridge;revision=11474

So I noticed.  Why I didn't see it in the js is beyond me.  This does
however raise the question:  Why does it take so long to provision, and
are there ways to speed it up?

Andrew Bartlett

-- 
Andrew Bartlett                                http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team           http://samba.org
Student Network Administrator, Hawker College  http://hawkerc.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/attachments/20051228/9a98211b/attachment.bin