[Samba] Using separate packages for a DC

[miguel medalha]

> bullshit "smb" is the shortname for "samba"

In general, yes. But the daemon responsible for the AD DC is named 'samba'.

> 'smb.conf' and 'samba.conf' is far away from *directly identifiable*

See above.

> the whole topic starts with idiocity by "How about building two 
> different samba packages (on a distribution such as debian)" given that 
> the distribution-layer is the least relevant

Calm down! Why being that aggressive? We are not talking life and dead subjects here!