[Samba] Rebasing a 4.11 windows build to current Samba.

[David Bean]

Andrew,

Thank you for responding. I originally started down that track but had problems building several dependencies early on. I opted to move it to Cygwin because it was more familiar for me and many of the required dependencies were buildable. With more experience now I can certainly see your point as far as getting a windows build for mainline, so I may try that again soon.

There may be some value in the Cygwin work I did for ReactOS which was my target so I still plan to tweak it some more.

Dave Bean
________________________________
From: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet at samba.org>
Sent: Thursday, December 7, 2023 4:12 PM
To: David Bean <d_bean at hotmail.com>; samba at lists.samba.org <samba at lists.samba.org>
Subject: Rebasing a 4.11 windows build to current Samba.

On Thu, 2023-12-07 at 19:22 +0000, David Bean via samba wrote:

I have a semi working 32-bit build of Samba 4.11.0 for Windows based on a patched Cygwin 2.5.2 build. I wondered if anyone knows where a set of DIF files to move it from release 4.11.0 to the latest stable release of 4.19.x (or through each intervening release to that point) could be obtained. I would like to apply changes incrementally to this build to avoid breaking the current work I have in place, and a set of DIF files seems like a good alternative.


Dave Bean

Samba is version controlled in "git" so every change is there.  We used to publish diffs between releases, but they are really not useful for what you want.

What I suggest is that you have a go at applying the same changes for your "semi working 32-bit build for Windows" to current Samba, and then focus on fixing what breaks.  The build system and the things you need are not likely to have changed that much.

Or, use a 'git bisect', applying your fixes after each bisection point, and see how ever you can come before it stops working.

In the long term, I think the best hope for Windows binaries are via a cross-compile with mingw on Linux, because while cross-compilation of Samba sucks, we already use that to build the uploaded winexe binary, and we could possibly accept such a change upstream and have it run in CI, whereas a 'build on windows' approach would never be able to be tested.

Andrew Bartlett


--

Andrew Bartlett (he/him)       https://samba.org/~abartlet/
Samba Team Member (since 2001) https://samba.org
Samba Team Lead                https://catalyst.net.nz/services/samba
Catalyst.Net Ltd

Proudly developing Samba for Catalyst.Net Ltd - a Catalyst IT group company

Samba Development and Support: https://catalyst.net.nz/services/samba

Catalyst IT - Expert Open Source Solutions