[Samba] Windows ACLs

[Sonic]

Rowland it makes no difference if I point resolv.conf to the DC or the
cache (which contains all the records).
I have tested both ways and also run your script both ways, there is
absolutely no difference outside of the address the script reports as
the nameserver. Every single test of the DC records is successful in
either case.
I certainly appreciate your help and would like to resolve this issue
which is why I do also test with resolv.conf pointing to the DC (and
did so before my first post about this issue) so this is certainly not
where the problem lies.

Chris


On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 2:29 PM Rowland Penny via samba
<samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 23/09/2022 19:18, Sonic wrote:
> > Although I do have some installations where the clients update their
> > DNS records on the DC and then the stub-zones in Unbound are
> > configured with 'stub-no-cache: yes' so that queries are always
> > forwarded. This is mainly for maintenance convenience as those systems
> > are not acting as any type of server.
>
> Sorry sonic, but I have given you the benefit of my experience, but you
> do not seem to want to accept it, so I am out of here, I cannot help
> further.
>
> Rowland
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba