[Samba] Debian Bullseye samba 4.16.1 online (amd64/arm64/armhf/i386)

L. van Belle belle at samba.org
Fri May 13 08:23:06 UTC 2022


Ok, small update on this.. 

I have removed current packages of bullseye 4.16 

I've seen why I worked here and why not online.. 

Few packages where in my test repo and that resulted in a version numberein conflict
and this also applied to the official backport packages.

I'll have to redo this one fully. Sorry guys, a longer wait on this one. 
I hoped to be able to "reuse" the backport packages, its possible, 
but only if I don’t change the package version-naming  and that’s a no go. 

I've started on the builds already. 
You check multiple times and miss 1 thing that created this mess.. 
☹ 

Greetz, 

Louis



> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van: samba Namens L.P.H. van Belle via samba
> Verzonden: vrijdag 13 mei 2022 08:48
> Aan: samba at lists.samba.org
> Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] Debian Bullseye samba 4.16.1 online
> (amd64/arm64/armhf/i386)
> 
> You have to Enable bullseye backports repo also.
> That will provide the needed depends for the samba pakcages.
> 
> hmm, I see now its not handy to keep these depends in bullseye-backports.
> I'll do the depends also today and upload these to my repo.
> missing on my repo are talloc tdb and ldb packages.
> 
> 
> Greetz,
> 
> Louis
> 
> 
> > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> > Van: samba Namens spindles seven via samba
> > Verzonden: donderdag 12 mei 2022 18:06
> > Aan: 'sambalist' <samba at lists.samba.org>
> > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] Debian Bullseye samba 4.16.1 online
> > (amd64/arm64/armhf/i386)
> >
> > On 12 May 2022 15:20 L. van Belle wrote:
> > > Hai,
> > >
> > > As mentioned and later then normal.. Finaly there..
> > > Samba 4.16.1 is on my repo for debian Bullseye.
> > > You have choice these days, since the packages are now up2date
> > >
> > Hi Louis,
> > Have tried to update one of my servers from samba version 4.14.7 to
> > 4.16.1 using your repo and I get the response that it will remove all the
> samba
> > modules rather than upgrading them.   Have tried it on two different
> boxes,
> > both with the same result:
> >
> > roy at moggy:~$ sudo apt-get dist-upgrade --autoremove Reading package
> > lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Reading state information...
> > Done Calculating upgrade... Done The following packages will be REMOVED:
> >   libnss-winbind libpam-winbind libyaml-0-2 python3-dnspython python3-
> gpg
> >   python3-markdown python3-pygments python3-requests-toolbelt
> > python3-samba
> >   python3-tdb python3-yaml samba samba-common samba-common-bin
> > tdb-tools
> >   winbind
> > The following NEW packages will be installed:
> >   linux-image-5.10.0-13-amd64
> > The following packages will be upgraded:
> >   linux-image-amd64
> > 1 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 16 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
> > Need to get 53.8 MB of archives.
> > After this operation, 251 MB of additional disk space will be used.
> > Do you want to continue? [Y/n] n
> > Abort.
> >
> > All I did was to edit the van-belle.list file and run the apt-get update and
> apt-
> > get dist-upgrade commands.    I suspect a dependency is missing, but
> what?
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Roy Eastwood
> >
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> > instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
> 
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba





More information about the samba mailing list