[Samba] Bind9 and reverse-zones

Stefan Kania stefan at kania-online.de
Fri Feb 18 10:33:49 UTC 2022

Am 18.02.22 um 11:14 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba:
> On Fri, 2022-02-18 at 11:06 +0100, Stefan Kania via samba wrote:
>> 	Error verifying signature: parse error
>> --------------ms080007090900080200050009
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>> Am 18.02.22 um 09:14 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba:
>>> Once deleted and recreated, a
>>> reversezone will quickly get populated again.
>> Not if you hasve static entries, then you have to recreate all
>> entries.
>> With 30 or 40 revers-zones it's a lot of work.
> It would be, but why would you have that many reversezones ? 

We have many sites, all with own subnet
> there must be a lot of overlapping. 

No, each site has a different subnet
But if you must have that many,
> script the addition of static entries.
That's not the point, the point is that the NS-record should not get
lost during recover, it works with the forward-zone. During recover from
a backup the forward-zones will get the name of the recover-dc as
NS-record and this should also work with all existing revers-zones. I
don't want to tinker around with some scripts
> Rowland

More information about the samba mailing list