[Samba] wiki samba
rpenny at samba.org
Wed Jul 7 11:29:48 UTC 2021
On Wed, 2021-07-07 at 13:06 +0200, BW wrote:
> I will claim that 95% of all potential contributions will get lost if
> it's not very-easy to publish. I myself have tried for many days to
> get a login without success.
If you open the wiki, on the top line, at the right, it says
'Anonymous', if you click that link a small box opens with a link
'Create account'. If you follow this link it tells you how to sign up
> Wikipedia and Arch Linux allow everybody to contribute very easy! And
> that's why their wiki are one of the most up-to-date wikies on the
> internet and they are actually very clean and high quality.
I wouldn't say that wikipedia is up-to-date (or correct), Arch Linux is
a distro and how they allow access is their responsibility. Also there
are mistakes on the Arch Linux Samba pages (in my opinion).
> And the samba wiki is in my view not up-to-date.
Please point out where you think it isn't up-to-date and lets discuss
> But that's not really
> the point. Let's say, for the argument it was up-to-date, it will
> still be out-dated sooner or later. So it would be nice if it was
> possible to update for everybody relatively easy (I'll claim it not
> possible in practice even thought you says otherwise).
It is easy to update, once you have registered.
> Again, just look at wikipedia.....it says it all.
As I said, not a good example, they tried to tell me how to pronounce
the name of the town that I have lived in all my life, they got it
wrong, but wouldn't accept it.
More information about the samba