[Samba] hostname is missing in the output from "smbstatus -b"

Rowland Penny rpenny at samba.org
Mon Feb 4 20:30:11 UTC 2019


On Mon, 4 Feb 2019 20:32:53 +0100
Meike Stone via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:

> Hello Rowland,
> thanks for answering so fast.
> 
> > >
> > > we have migrated our Samba server from version 3.6 to Samba 4.6.
> > >
> > > Everyting is working fine, but I have seen one difference in the
> > > output from "smbstatus -b".
> > >
> > > The hostname in the output is no longer displayed (see examples
> > > below) 1) The hostname must come from Session setup or similar,
> > > because we don't have any
> > >  name resolution for clients.
> > > 2) The hostname from the clients is usefull for us, because a lot
> > > of clients are behind a NAT-Gateway and comes with one IP ( in
> > > example the 192.168.12.30) ! In the old version I could see from
> > > witch host each user came.
> > >
> > > In the new version, I only see the IP address two times.
> > >
> >
> > This may be an artefact of turning off NTLMv1,
> So there is nowedays no possibility to track, from witch
> client name the connection comes (behind a NAT Gateway)?

Samba uses dns nowadays.

> 
> > try adding 'ntlm auth =
> > yes' to your smb.conf and restarting Samba. If this cures your
> > problem, then you have to decide if you can run with an insecure
> > set up.
> 
> This option is turned on already.
> I know, this is a total ugly, insecure setup, but we have to run a
> single samba for
> W2k3 Terminal Servers and Windows XP-Clients (max protocol = NT1 ntlm
> auth = yes, backend ldap).

Well, seeing as W2k3, XP and Samba 4.6.x are all EOL, you might as well
go back to 3.6.x, that is EOL as well. ;-)

Rowland



More information about the samba mailing list