[Samba] Odd behavior since upgrading to 4.9.6
rpenny at samba.org
Tue Apr 23 16:34:11 UTC 2019
On Tue, 23 Apr 2019 11:11:21 -0500 (CDT)
Mike Ray via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
> About a week and half ago I upgraded from 4.0.12 to 4.9.6. Overall,
> things are functioning.
> However, I have come across several strange behaviors and wandered if
> anyone else has noticed similar behavior on 4.9.6 or has any
> suggestions of what might be occurring.
> As background information, I have 3 DCs (dc3, dc4 and dc5) -- all
> running the same version (4.9.6) and all have the same configuration;
> dc3 was the original holder of all 7 FSMO roles, but as of last
> night, they were all transferred to dc4.
> First off, all the DCs hold steady at different levels of memory
> utilized. dc3 hovers at about 1.5 GB used, dc4 hovers at about .75 GB
> used and dc5 hovers at a little less than .5 GB used. I think that
> the difference in memory used might be related is the number of
> samba/smbd processes running; dc3 has about 250 samba/smbd processes
> running, dc4 has about 100 and dc5 has about 30. But why are so many
> more clients connecting to dc3?
> Secondly, dc5 has been having quirky issues ever since the upgrade. I
> run various health checks on the DCs nightly and it seems that every
> other day "samba-tool drs kcc dc5" from one of the other two DCs
> fails with "ERROR(runtime): DsExecuteKCC failed - (3221356597, 'The
> operation cannot be performed.')". dc5 also has issues creating an
> online backup and intermittently errors out with: "ERROR(<type
> 'exceptions.IndexError'>): uncaught exception - list index out of
> range". I did see a note about this in the troubleshooting section of
> the samba backup wiki page; however, the error comes and goes, so I
> don't know if this means it is something else.
> Lastly (and most disturbingly), I moved the FSMO roles from dc3 to
> dc4 last night (to see if the load on dc3 was related to owning those
> roles) and had huge instability this morning. All dcs looked OK last
> night (I did restart samba on dc3 when the system was experiencing
> low memory), but I cam in this morning and found that dc4 and dc5 had
> such high loads that clients that were communicating with those DCs
> were unable to log in. Our monitoring system saw huge CPU loads as of
> this morning and a memory instability (jumping up and down) since
> just after the FSMO role transfer last night. Are there known issues
> with transferring FSMO roles that might explain the instability? Is
> it best practice to restart samba after doing a FSMO transfer just in
I wonder if you are hitting this bug:
I know it is supposed to be fixed, but I wonder ??
Is there anyway you can downgrade again, then walk your way up the
Upgrade to 4.7.x, then 4.8.x then 4.9.x
A new type of indexing was introduced at 4.8.0 and this lead to
problems if you upgraded from 4.7.x (or earlier) directly to 4.9.x
Can I also suggest you upgrade a bit more often in future ;-)
Samba gets lots of nice things added very often.
More information about the samba