[Samba] samba behavior change with version upgrade

[Rowland Penny]

On Thu, 7 Jun 2018 09:57:23 -0400
"David H. Durgee via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:

> L.P.H. van Belle via samba wrote:
> > David,
> >
> > So only Rowland is allowed to help?? If everybody does that them in
> > feeling really sorry for him. There are lots of people here with
> > very good knowledge. Even if its a long post, everything might be
> > relevant, i suggest, you try it.. It does not hurt. Anonimize the
> > config if needed.
> >
> > Just my saying..
> >
> > Greetz,
> >
> > Louis
> >
> >
> >> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> >> Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens
> >> David H. Durgee via samba
> >> Verzonden: donderdag 7 juni 2018 15:35
> >> Aan: Rowland Penny via samba
> >> Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] samba behavior change with version upgrade
> >>
> >> Rowland Penny via samba wrote:
> >>> On Thu, 7 Jun 2018 07:38:38 -0400
> >>> "David H. Durgee via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>    
> >>>> Attached please find a zip containing the two smb.conf files
> >>>> with a suffix identifying their origin.  If you need any
> >>>> additional information please let me know.
> >>>>
> >>> Sorry, this list strips attachments, please post them in a
> >>> post ;-)
> >>>
> >>> Rowland
> >> I noticed that and sent you an email with the attachment included.
> >> Please inspect them and feel free to post a reply to the list with
> >> excerpts of them as appropriate to the problem I am seeing.
> >> I attached
> >> them as a zip as much of the smb.conf files are comments, and
> >> it would
> >> have resulted in a very long post with only tiny portions relevant
> >> to the discussion.
> >>
> >> Dave
> >>
> >> -- 
> >> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> >> instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
> 
> My apologies, I had no intent to limit input of others, I simply
> wanted someone with expertise I don't have to prune the irrelevant
> content of the two smb.conf files so that only that which might
> possibly have bearing on the problem would be imposed on the list
> participants.  These files total over 800 lines, much of which are
> comments and likely much else of no relevance to this issue.
> 
> As Rowland was the only one to respond to my posts to that point, I 
> hoped that he had sufficient interest in the problem to prune the
> files to their relevant portions.

Yes, but I shouldn't have to.


>  I will be happy to email copies to
> anyone else who wishes to inspect the full content of these files.

Don't bother, I have posted them for you.

> 
> Perhaps the list owner should consider revision of the attachment 
> policy, as this would have been unnecessary had the attachment
> remained with the post.  I see little problem with permitting zip
> files to be attached, but perhaps I am not sufficiently versed or
> paranoid to make a call on this.

This list has never allowed attachments and will never allow
attachments.

Rowland