[Samba] After upgrade to 4.9.4, internal DNS no longer working

[Viktor Trojanovic]

Hi Rowland,

Thanks for taking an interest.

On Wed, 26 Dec 2018 at 14:27, Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>
wrote:

> On Wed, 26 Dec 2018 11:43:37 +0100
> Viktor Trojanovic <viktor at troja.ch> wrote:
>
> > I could really use some support with this. I understand it's always
> > possible to just restore from a backup but the more interesting
> > question is if something can be done with the data at hand.
> > Basically, I'm trying to understand how it's possible that a dbcheck
> > shows no errors, an ldbsearch is successful, and yet it's not
> > possible to start the AD properly. What else is there that could be
> > corrupted, and is there a way to repair it?
> >
>
> OK, I have been reviewing all the posts in this thread and I have a few
> questions ;-)
>
> You posted that you are running the DC using the internal DNS server,
> but you also posted this:
>
> All checks on the flat files work fine
>
> What 'flat files' ?
> Are you referring to Bind9 flat files ?
>
>
No. I meant the *.tdb and *.ldb files in the samba directory. I'm using the
internal DNS server, I don't have Bind installed, never had.


> There is also this:
>
> kdc_task_init: Cannot determine if we are an RODC: operations error at
> ../source4/dsdb/common/util.c:3534
> task_server_terminate: task_server_terminate: [kdc: krb5_init_context
> samdb RODC connect failed]
>
> Why is 'RODC' getting mentioned ?
>
>
I don't even know what RODC is. :) This is a regular AD DC install as it is
described on the Wiki, I didn't do anything exotic there.


> Can you post the contents of:
>
> /etc/hostname
>

DC1


> /etc/nsswitch.conf
>
>
passwd: files winbind mymachines systemd
group: files winbind mymachines systemd
shadow: files

publickey: files

hosts: files mymachines myhostname resolve [!UNAVAIL=return] dns
networks: files

protocols: files
services: files
ethers: files
rpc: files

netgroup: files


Could the separate Samba daemons (smbd, nmbd, winbind) be being started
> instead of/as well as the 'samba' daemon ?
>
>
No, it's really just the "Samba AD Daemon" (samba.service). smbd
(smb.service), nmbd (nmb.service), as well as winbindd (winbind.service)
are not started. As you could see from the log, the binaries such as smbd
and winbindd are indeed started but I guess that is done by Samba
automatically?