[Samba] NS records for a new AD DC

[mathias dufresne]

2016-10-19 11:45 GMT+02:00 Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>:

> On Wed, 19 Oct 2016 11:40:57 +0200
> mathias dufresne <infractory at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > 2016-10-19 8:56 GMT+02:00 Rowland Penny via samba
> > <samba at lists.samba.org>:
> >
> > > On Wed, 19 Oct 2016 08:47:25 +0200
> > > mathias dufresne <infractory at gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > The domain member will ask its nameserver (which should be an AD
> > > > > DC),
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > The client send request to its resolver, which can be an AD DC
> > > > but not necessarily (we don't use AD DC as resolver, we use the
> > > > company's DNS which transfer request to AD DC when needed)
> > > >
> > >
> > > You seem to be doing it in the reverse of the recommended way.
> > > i.e. you forward to the DC
> > >
> >
> > That's not the point.
> > Re-read my previous mail please, forget about the fact we forward to
> > the DC as is does not change at all the way DNS is working.
> >
> > And please try to defend your argumentation rather than answering
> > something else.
> >
>
> No, I am not going to start another argument about DNS, you have your
> point of view and I have mine. You do it your way and I do it my way,
> your way works for you and mine works for me.
>

I have arguments for sure. I did made tests to get them.


>
> Lets leave it at that.
>

You're right, it's better you continue to write wrong things about DNS
behavior in Samba AD.

Sorry aout that.


>
> Rowland
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
>