[Samba] 10GE performance issues
Gary Dale
garydale at torfree.net
Thu Feb 4 04:16:35 UTC 2016
On 03/02/16 03:27 PM, Martin Markert wrote:
> Hi,
> we have network performance issues with Samba (Version 4.2.7-SerNet-RedHat-19.el6) on one of our servers. The maximum throughput from client to server is 110 MB/s (read/write) under Windows 7 x64 (single 10GE NIC). When using NFS on a different Linux workstation we're getting much higher rates, around 500-700 MB/s. I still can't find the problem.
>
> Setup server:
> CentOS 6.6
> Samba 4.7.2
> Mellanox 10GE NIC with LACP bonding
> local attached storage: XFS, 1,5 GB/s read/write
>
> [global]
>
> workgroup = ARRI
> server string = Samba Server Version %v
> netbios name = BARBARELLA
>
> log file = /var/log/samba/%m_%a_%R.log
> max log size = 50
> log level = 1
>
> security = ads
> realm = ARRI.DE
> encrypt passwords = Yes
>
> winbind enum users = Yes
> winbind enum groups = Yes
> winbind use default domain = Yes
> winbind nested groups = Yes
> winbind separator = +
> winbind offline logon = false
>
> idmap config * : backend = tdb
> idmap config * : range = 600-799
> idmap config ARRI:backend = ad
> idmap config ARRI:range = 800-19999
> idmap config ARRI:schema_mode = rfc2307
>
> allow trusted domains = Yes
> server signing = mandatory
> client signing = mandatory
> client use spnego = Yes
> ntlm auth = Yes
> lanman auth = No
>
> preferred master = no
>
> printcap name = /etc/printcap
> load printers = no
>
>
> Do you have any suggestions?
>
> Kind regards,
> Martin
> --
> Martin Markert
> Westendstr. 89
> 80339 München
>
>
I could hazard a guess that NFS is simply faster than CIFS. Still
getting only 10% of the raw disk capability seems pretty bad. Would I be
right in assuming the two different workstations are similar in terms of
hardware?
Also, have you considered the possibility that it might be a Windows 7
configuration problem?
More information about the samba
mailing list