[Samba] Questions About Bind_DLZ

[David Minard]

G'day Marc,

> Hello David,
>
> Am 29.09.2015 um 06:34 schrieb David Minard:
> >/      However, looking at the logs for bind, I see the following every
> />/  time bind gets reloaded:
> />/  
> />/  28-Sep-2015 10:18:01.952 database: warning: samba_dlz: Ignoring
> />/  duplicate zone 'samba4.scem.westernsydney.edu.au' from
> />/  'DC=@,DC=samba4.scem.westernsydney.edu.au,CN=MicrosoftDNS,DC=DomainDnsZones,DC=samba4,DC=scem,DC=westernsydney,DC=edu,DC=au'
> />/  
> />/  ...
> /
> Does the samba4.vscem.westernsydney.edu.au exist only inside the AD? Or
> do you have defined it in BIND (named.conf), too?

Yes to the first part.  Nope to the second part.  The only reference to 
it in named.conf is:

#  Samba4
     include "/usr/local/samba/private/named.conf";

> What is the output of
> # ldbsearch -H /usr/local/samba/private/sam.ldb '(objectClass=dnsZone)'
> -b 'DC=samdom,DC=example,DC=com' --cross-ncs name
>

ldbsearch -H /usr/local/samba/private/sam.ldb '(objectClass=dnsZone)' -b 
'DC=SAMBA4,DC=SCEM,DC=WESTERNSYDNEY,DC=EDU,DC=AU' --cross-ncs name

# record 1
dn: 
DC=samba4.scem.westernsydney.edu.au,CN=MicrosoftDNS,DC=DomainDnsZones,DC=samba4,DC=scem,DC=westernsydney,DC=edu,DC=au
name: samba4.scem.westernsydney.edu.au

# record 2
dn: 
DC=RootDNSServers,CN=MicrosoftDNS,DC=DomainDnsZones,DC=samba4,DC=scem,DC=westernsydney,DC=edu,DC=au
name: RootDNSServers

# record 3
dn: 
DC=_msdcs.samba4.scem.westernsydney.edu.au,CN=MicrosoftDNS,DC=ForestDnsZones,DC=samba4,DC=scem,DC=westernsydney,DC=edu,DC=au
name: _msdcs.samba4.scem.westernsydney.edu.au

# record 4
dn: 
DC=RootDNSServers,CN=MicrosoftDNS,CN=System,DC=samba4,DC=scem,DC=westernsydney,DC=edu,DC=au
name: RootDNSServers

# returned 4 records
# 4 entries
# 0 referrals

> BTW: What do you do, if we release Samba 5.0? Do you rename your AD DNS
> zone(s)? ;-) We while ago we had an internal team discussion, if 4.3
> should be 4.3 or 5.0 to get this misconception out of the world, that
> Samba4 means Samba-AD-only.

No.  Hopefully the samba4.x.x name sticks around for a long time :-)

No misconception here.  I only called it samba4.blah.blah to 
differentiate it from our samba3 boxes.  I know samba4 can do everything 
samba3 does, as well as being an AD.  I have already migrated a few S3 
boxes over to use S4 for S3 style file/print/profile servers etc.

>
>
>
>
>
> >/  29-Sep-2015 10:57:43.108 database: error: samba_dlz b9_format: unhandled
> />/  record type 0
> />/  29-Sep-2015 10:57:43.109 database: error: samba_dlz b9_format: unhandled
> />/  record type 0
> />/  
> />/      Only once mind you.  Should I be concerned?  The other DCs didn't
> />/  get this error.
> /
> Günter answerd this a while ago:
> https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2014-January/178083.html
>
>
>
>
>
> >/      Lastly, as we are a multi site set up, we currently run bind using
> />/  "Views".
> /
> Sorry. Never used DNS views.
>
>
>
>
>
> Regards,
> Marc

-- 

Cheers,
David Minard.
Ph:    0247 360 155
Fax:    0247 360 770

School of Computing, Engineering, and Mathematics
Building Y - Penrith Campus (Kingswood)
Locked bag 1797
Penrith South DC
NSW 1797

[Sometimes waking up just isn't worth the insult of the day to come.]


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.