[Samba] samba 4.1.4 bind9 putrr: unhandled record type 0
Günter Kukkukk
linux at kukkukk.com
Thu Jan 16 18:50:31 MST 2014
Am 16.01.2014 12:03, schrieb L.P.H. van Belle:
> Hai,
>
> In seeing these messages in my logs,
>
> named: samba b9_putrr: unhandled record type 0
>
> Everything looks and works ok, but i can find what the above message means and/or if its harmfull.
>
>
> Greetz.
>
> Louis
>
from the following list the samba DLZ dns driver implementation does
atm handle the marked 10 record types:
DNS_TYPE_TOMBSTONE=(int)(0x0),
=> DNS_TYPE_A=(int)(0x1),
=> DNS_TYPE_NS=(int)(0x2),
DNS_TYPE_MD=(int)(0x3),
DNS_TYPE_MF=(int)(0x4),
=> DNS_TYPE_CNAME=(int)(0x5),
=> DNS_TYPE_SOA=(int)(0x6),
DNS_TYPE_MB=(int)(0x7),
DNS_TYPE_MG=(int)(0x8),
DNS_TYPE_MR=(int)(0x9),
DNS_TYPE_NULL=(int)(0xA),
DNS_TYPE_WKS=(int)(0xB),
=> DNS_TYPE_PTR=(int)(0xC),
=> DNS_TYPE_HINFO=(int)(0xD),
DNS_TYPE_MINFO=(int)(0xE),
=> DNS_TYPE_MX=(int)(0xF),
=> DNS_TYPE_TXT=(int)(0x10),
DNS_TYPE_RP=(int)(0x11),
DNS_TYPE_AFSDB=(int)(0x12),
DNS_TYPE_X25=(int)(0x13),
DNS_TYPE_ISDN=(int)(0x14),
DNS_TYPE_RT=(int)(0x15),
DNS_TYPE_SIG=(int)(0x18),
DNS_TYPE_KEY=(int)(0x19),
=> DNS_TYPE_AAAA=(int)(0x1C),
DNS_TYPE_LOC=(int)(0x1D),
DNS_TYPE_NXT=(int)(0x1E),
=> DNS_TYPE_SRV=(int)(0x21),
DNS_TYPE_ATMA=(int)(0x22),
DNS_TYPE_NAPTR=(int)(0x23),
DNS_TYPE_DNAME=(int)(0x27),
DNS_TYPE_DS=(int)(0x2B),
DNS_TYPE_RRSIG=(int)(0x2E),
DNS_TYPE_NSEC=(int)(0x2F),
DNS_TYPE_DNSKEY=(int)(0x30),
DNS_TYPE_DHCID=(int)(0x31),
DNS_TYPE_ALL=(int)(0xFF),
DNS_TYPE_WINS=(int)(0xFF01),
DNS_TYPE_WINSR=(int)(0xFF02)
-----
or in other words:
} dns_typemap[] = {
{ DNS_TYPE_A, "A" , false},
{ DNS_TYPE_AAAA, "AAAA" , false},
{ DNS_TYPE_CNAME, "CNAME" , true},
{ DNS_TYPE_TXT, "TXT" , false},
{ DNS_TYPE_PTR, "PTR" , false},
{ DNS_TYPE_SRV, "SRV" , false},
{ DNS_TYPE_MX, "MX" , false},
{ DNS_TYPE_HINFO, "HINFO" , false},
{ DNS_TYPE_NS, "NS" , false},
{ DNS_TYPE_SOA, "SOA" , true},
};
------
So the failing one you notice is:
DNS_TYPE_TOMBSTONE=(int)(0x0)
I'm atm searching how all this tombstone (is deleted) stuff
should be handled correctly...
Do you see any correlation, when this message is written to the log?
Could help to setup a testcase! :-)
Btw - the _internal_ samba dns server is a completely separate implementation.
Cheers, Günter
More information about the samba
mailing list