[Samba] RequireSecuritySignature=1 and public share with guest not working
r.olszewski at ssc-services.de
Mon Mar 16 01:56:18 MDT 2015
As i wrote in my first post, i tried even with these settings:
client max protocol = SMB3
client min protocol = SMB2
client signing = required
server signing = required
But it was not working - as soon I use RequireSecuritySignature=1 on the client.
It seems for that the client is stopping communication since the Win7-client expects something from samba.
net use t: \\samba\pub<file:///\\samba\pub>
MS knowledgebase article speek about enable plain text passwords. But this is wrong since I do not change this password-setting, just require signing.
Is somebody out there, who knows, how to setup samba for using RequireSecuritySignature=1 on Windows Clients?
Von: L.P.H. van Belle [mailto:belle at bazuin.nl]
Gesendet: Freitag, 13. März 2015 16:21
An: samba at lists.samba.org
Cc: Olszewski, Raphael
Betreff: RE: [Samba] RequireSecuritySignature=1 and public share with guest not working
check the output of :
echo "\n" | testparm -vv | grep signing
echo "\n" | testparm -vv | grep protocol
for my the default is :
client max protocol = NT1
but i dont use signing.
but i "think" you need to set the client signing = manadatory and client max protocol = SMB2
( from man smb.conf )
but if anyone know this better on the list, please correct me.
Im not sure in this one, never used it..
>Van: r.olszewski at ssc-services.de
>[mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Olszewski, Raphael
>Verzonden: vrijdag 13 maart 2015 15:57
>Aan: samba at lists.samba.org
>Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] RequireSecuritySignature=1 and public share with
>guest not working
>I explicitly have to change on win7-client the parameter
>from RequireSecuritySignature=0 => RequireSecuritySignature=1
>and then I have the problem.
>Before everything is working.
>All solutions in the wide web just tell me to set
>RequireSecuritySignature=0, but this is NOT the solution for me since I
>have to activate RequireSecuritySignature=1 My question originally is:
>Why it is failing then? Or what I have to do, that this is working with
More information about the samba