[Samba] Samba 3.6 security fixes

John Blac johnblac at gmail.com
Tue Jun 30 03:21:55 MDT 2015


Thank you for the responses!

Hi Helmut, I actually prefer moving into a newer version that has all the
great new features, but due to policies inside our firm it will be a long
process. I find the idea of modifying the new version Samba to start up
like the old version. Very crafty! :)

Hi Volker, yes we do have a support contract with Red Hat and Oracle. The
version we are currently using is compiled by us and not from any vendor.
Thank you suggestion, I'll try to ask the Samba team.



On Monday, June 29, 2015, Helmut Hullen <Hullen at t-online.de> wrote:

> Hallo, John,
>
> Du meintest am 29.06.15:
>
> > Good day! I have a few questions regarding the status of Samba 3.6, I
> > know it's now EOL but I'll ask anyway.
>
> > We currently have a large install base of Samba version 3.6 at the
> > moment in our environment and we can't migrate immediately.
>
> Do you really need Samba 3.6? Or do you only need a version without
> Kerberos and LDAP (just naming 2 major differences)?
>
> I'm using on several machines Samba 4.1 in the "old fashioned" way:
> starting smbd and nmbd like in versions 3.6 and older, with an only
> gradually changed "init" script. Works very well.
>
> Viele Gruesse!
> Helmut
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
>


More information about the samba mailing list