[Samba] sssd-ad cannot be installed with sernet samba

[L.P.H. van Belle]

Sure it does work, i do everything without sssd and works fine. 
BUT you need to configure samba correctly and use it correct. 

and as i pointed out, if you really need the latest samba and sssd 
Go use debian Jessie. 

>Two points.
>If package is supposed to be a replacement, it should, at the 
>very least,
>provide same names. At. The. Very. Least.
>If package provide deficient functionality (nss module unable to supply
>home/shell data? That's a nonsense!), it is useless and needs to be
>replaced or fixed.

This is due misconfiguration imo. 


>To repeat that sernet provides _partial_ functionality. sssd is not an 
>add-on. It provides the functionality which is missing in sernet.
so tell us whats missing, im not missing anything. 


>I still don't know where to report this packaging bug....
If you want to report it, then its at sssd. 
why. 

Sernet is not official in the distro's and therfore is not supported by the distro's. 
so imo this wont be fixed. 

Again.. 
switch to debian Jessie, which is fine. yes its testing atm but in a few months it wil be the new stable. 
Als long as you dont install to many, you wil be fine, my print server is Debian jessie for about 6 months now.. 



Greetz, 

Louis

>-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
>Van: anrdaemon at yandex.ru 
>[mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Andrey Repin
>Verzonden: woensdag 1 april 2015 2:43
>Aan: Rowland Penny; samba at lists.samba.org
>Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] sssd-ad cannot be installed with sernet samba
>
>Greetings, Rowland Penny!
>
>>>> On 30/03/15 16:33, Luca Olivetti wrote:
>>>>>  Right, the correct solution would be to package samba in 
>a way that
>>>>>  doesn't break sssd.
>>>>
>>>> You could also say that sssd should be packaged in a way 
>that works 
>>>> with the sernet packages.
>>>
>>> I'm with Luca on this one.  It's not Debian/Ubuntu's 
>responsibility to 
>>> modify their distro packages work with random 3rd party 
>packages. If 
>>> sernet is in the business of building supported packages for Debian 
>>> and/or Ubuntu, they ought to build them to work with Debian and/or 
>>> Ubuntu's packages.
>
>> It all depends on what is meant by supported, Debian/Ubuntu supports 
>> their packages and Sernet supports their Samba packages. Why should 
>> Sernet support something they do not supply ?
>
>Two points.
>If package is supposed to be a replacement, it should, at the 
>very least,
>provide same names. At. The. Very. Least.
>If package provide deficient functionality (nss module unable to supply
>home/shell data? That's a nonsense!), it is useless and needs to be
>replaced or fixed.
>
>> Sernets packages work as a complete system, they do not need 
>to support the
>> use of sssd with their packages, their packages work without it.
>
>You just said that they don't work. A few lines above.
>
>
>-- 
>With best regards,
>Andrey Repin
>Wednesday, April 1, 2015 03:38:40
>
>Sorry for my terrible english...
>
>-- 
>To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
>instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
>
>