[Samba] ctdb issue: existing header for db_id 0xf2a58948 has larger RSN 1 than new RSN 1 in ctdb_persistent_store

zhanghui.hui.Zh zhanghui.hui.Zh at huawei.com
Mon Mar 31 03:09:06 MDT 2014


Hello
I find the following email form internet, and I have the same problem, can you share your information about this issue?



[Samba] ctdb issue: existing header for db_id 0xf2a58948 has larger RSN 1 than new RSN 1 in ctdb_persistent_store
Nate Hardt nate at scalecomputing.com <mailto:samba%40lists.samba.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BSamba%5D%20ctdb%20issue%3A%20existing%20header%20for%20db_id%200xf2a58948%20has%20larger%0A%20RSN%201%20than%20new%20RSN%201%20in%20ctdb_persistent_store&In-Reply-To=%3CCBDA9D3E.65352%25nate%40scalecomputing.com%3E>
Tue May 22 12:49:56 MDT 2012

  *   Previous message: [Samba] Samba4 - create a new auxiliary classe in AD<https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2012-May/167593.html>
  *   Next message: [Samba] Some what breaking security model in Samba; LDAP + SMB shares<https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2012-May/167563.html>
  *   Messages sorted by: [ date ]<https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2012-May/date.html#167561> [ thread ]<https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2012-May/thread.html#167561> [ subject ]<https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2012-May/subject.html#167561> [ author ]<https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2012-May/author.html#167561>

________________________________

Hello,

I have an issue with ctdb that I am not sure how to handle. I am running

ctdb-1.0.114.3-3. It looks like some sort of error occurs during the first

time initialization. The log looks like the following:



2012/05/11 04:33:16.881297 [16069]: Starting CTDBD as pid : 16069

2012/05/11 04:33:16.987610 [16069]: Starting service nfs

2012/05/11 04:33:17.522194 [16069]: Starting NFS statd: [  OK  ]

2012/05/11 04:33:17.584356 [16069]: Starting NFS services:  [  OK  ]

2012/05/11 04:33:17.599905 [16069]: Starting NFS quotas: [  OK  ]

2012/05/11 04:33:17.610284 [16069]: Starting NFS daemon: [  OK  ]

2012/05/11 04:33:17.614978 [16069]: Starting NFS mountd: [  OK  ]

2012/05/11 04:33:18.690755 [16069]: Freeze priority 1

2012/05/11 04:33:18.690797 [16069]: Freeze priority 2

2012/05/11 04:33:18.690823 [16069]: Freeze priority 3

2012/05/11 04:33:25.366763 [16310]: Taking out recovery lock from recovery

daemon

2012/05/11 04:33:25.366798 [16310]: Take the recovery lock

2012/05/11 04:33:25.384030 [16310]: Recovery lock taken successfully

2012/05/11 04:33:25.384082 [16310]: Recovery lock taken successfully by

recovery daemon

2012/05/11 04:33:25.385542 [16069]: Freeze priority 1

2012/05/11 04:33:25.385925 [16069]: Freeze priority 2

2012/05/11 04:33:25.386353 [16069]: Freeze priority 3

2012/05/11 04:33:25.502987 [16069]: Thawing priority 1

2012/05/11 04:33:25.503015 [16069]: Release freeze handler for prio 1

2012/05/11 04:33:25.503029 [16069]: Thawing priority 2

2012/05/11 04:33:25.503035 [16069]: Release freeze handler for prio 2

2012/05/11 04:33:25.503043 [16069]: Thawing priority 3

2012/05/11 04:33:25.503048 [16069]: Release freeze handler for prio 3

2012/05/11 04:33:25.628783 [16310]: Resetting ban count to 0 for all nodes

2012/05/11 04:33:36.630768 [16310]: Trigger takeoverrun

2012/05/11 04:33:40.311048 [16069]: Vacuuming is disabled for persistent

database secrets.tdb

2012/05/11 04:33:40.318936 [16069]: Starting Winbind services: [  OK  ]

2012/05/11 04:33:40.364715 [16069]: Register srvid 18302628885633695744

for client 65882

2012/05/11 04:33:40.651327 [16310]: Trigger takeoverrun

2012/05/11 04:33:40.715231 [16069]: Vacuuming is disabled for persistent

database registry.tdb

2012/05/11 04:33:40.716911 [16069]: Register srvid 18302628885633695744

for client 590225

2012/05/11 04:33:40.918393 [16069]: Deregister srvid 18302628885633695744

for client 65882

2012/05/11 04:33:41.272762 [16069]: Deregister srvid 18302628885633695744

for client 590225

2012/05/11 04:33:41.277908 [16069]: Register srvid 18302628885633695744

for client 590225

2012/05/11 04:33:41.278179 [16069]: Deregister srvid 18302628885633695744

for client 590225

2012/05/11 04:33:41.278363 [16069]: Register srvid 18302628885633695744

for client 590225

2012/05/11 04:33:41.665087 [16069]: Deregister srvid 18302628885633695744

for client 590225

2012/05/11 04:33:41.812788 [16069]: Starting SMB services: [  OK  ]

2012/05/11 04:33:41.823170 [16069]: Register srvid 18302628885633695744

for client 197066

2012/05/11 04:33:41.823470 [16069]: Deregister srvid 18302628885633695744

for client 197066

2012/05/11 04:33:41.830941 [16310]: Trigger takeoverrun

2012/05/11 04:33:41.868203 [16069]: Vacuuming is disabled for persistent

database idmap2.tdb

2012/05/11 04:33:42.295718 [16069]: Starting NFS statd: [  OK  ]

2012/05/11 04:33:42.356951 [16069]: Starting NFS services:  [  OK  ]

2012/05/11 04:33:42.360369 [16069]: Starting NFS quotas: [  OK  ]

2012/05/11 04:33:42.379459 [16069]: Starting NFS daemon: [  OK  ]

2012/05/11 04:33:42.384079 [16069]: Starting NFS mountd: [  OK  ]

2012/05/11 04:33:42.423498 [16069]: Vacuuming is disabled for persistent

database passdb.tdb

2012/05/11 04:33:43.128728 [16069]: Vacuuming is disabled for persistent

database account_policy.tdb

2012/05/11 04:33:43.130165 [16069]: Register srvid 18302628885633695744

for client 197066

2012/05/11 04:33:43.552421 [16069]: Deregister srvid 18302628885633695744

for client 197066

2012/05/11 04:33:43.553907 [16069]: Register srvid 18302628885633695744

for client 197066

2012/05/11 04:33:44.511739 [16069]: Deregister srvid 18302628885633695744

for client 197066

2012/05/11 04:33:44.650918 [17887]: existing header for db_id 0xf2a58948

has larger RSN 2 than new RSN 1 in ctdb_persistent_store

2012/05/11 04:33:44.650953 [17887]: server/ctdb_persistent.c:548 Failed to

write persistent data

2012/05/11 04:33:44.782324 [16069]: Register srvid 18302628885633695744

for client 197066

2012/05/11 04:33:44.939908 [16069]: Deregister srvid 18302628885633695744

for client 197066

2012/05/11 04:33:44.940054 [16069]: Register srvid 18302628885633695744

for client 197066

2012/05/11 04:33:45.531550 [16069]: Deregister srvid 18302628885633695744

for client 197066

2012/05/11 04:33:45.783438 [16069]: Register srvid 18302628885633695744

for client 197066

2012/05/11 04:33:45.922782 [16069]: Deregister srvid 18302628885633695744

for client 197066

2012/05/11 04:33:45.923314 [16069]: Register srvid 18302628885633695744

for client 197066

2012/05/11 04:33:46.493837 [16069]: Deregister srvid 18302628885633695744

for client 197066

2012/05/11 04:33:46.621968 [16069]: Register srvid 18302628885633695744

for client 197066

2012/05/11 04:33:46.798018 [16069]: Deregister srvid 18302628885633695744

for client 197066

2012/05/11 04:33:46.798741 [16069]: Register srvid 18302628885633695744

for client 197066

2012/05/11 04:33:47.148225 [16069]: Deregister srvid 18302628885633695744

for client 197066

2012/05/11 04:33:47.148612 [16069]: Register srvid 18302628885633695744

for client 197066

2012/05/11 04:33:47.284055 [17954]: existing header for db_id 0xf2a58948

has larger RSN 1 than new RSN 1 in ctdb_persistent_store

2012/05/11 04:33:47.284115 [17954]: server/ctdb_persistent.c:548 Failed to

write persistent data

2012/05/11 04:33:47.475576 [17967]: existing header for db_id 0xf2a58948

has larger RSN 1 than new RSN 1 in ctdb_persistent_store

2012/05/11 04:33:47.475622 [17967]: server/ctdb_persistent.c:548 Failed to

write persistent data

2012/05/11 04:33:47.476030 [17968]: existing header for db_id 0xf2a58948

has larger RSN 1 than new RSN 1 in ctdb_persistent_store

2012/05/11 04:33:47.476059 [17968]: server/ctdb_persistent.c:548 Failed to

write persistent data

2012/05/11 04:33:47.476547 [17969]: existing header for db_id 0xf2a58948

has larger RSN 1 than new RSN 1 in ctdb_persistent_store







These last two messages will repeat until ctdb is restarted or the /

partition fills up. I see it most often in automated regressions that

setup ctdb from scratch. Can anyone provide insight as to what might cause

this and how to avoid it?



Thanks for any help or info you can provide,

Nate Hardt



More information about the samba mailing list