[Samba] Wiki should have Readme First
jwaters at h2os.com
Thu Mar 13 06:14:34 MDT 2014
I think he means use samba 4, but serve the files using smbd and not
samba in the samba4 package. With samba 4 you get both options. NT style
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 8:04 AM, steve <steve at steve-ss.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-03-13 at 12:43 +0100, Klaus Hartnegg wrote:
> > The accepted practice seems to be, set up Samba 4 for authorisation and
> > then set up a separate Samba3 fileserver.
> Very confusing. Samba3 is no longer developed. Surely we need to
> recommend Samba4 for both rôles? By all means, separate them.
> What does a Samba3 have that Samba4 doesn't?
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
More information about the samba