[Samba] SAMBA implementation for DOS ?
julius_ahenobarbus at yahoo.co.uk
Wed May 8 10:38:24 MDT 2013
Memory usage is the reason (imho) that Novell was king in the dos era. The lanman client was just too huge even running on NETBEUI. Add to that a TCP/IP stack and in DOS terms you have a 200 to 300 K behemoth.
I just googled "linux clipper compiler". Have you tried 'Clip?' Looks like it might fill the bill and then you wouldn't be stuck with the limitations of DOS
----- Original Message -----
From: czezz <czezz at o2.pl>
To: samba at lists.samba.org; Neal Murphy <neal.p.murphy at alum.wpi.edu>; samba at jubileegroup.co.uk; Marc Muehlfeld <samba at marc-muehlfeld.de>
Sent: Wednesday, 8 May 2013, 0:50
Subject: Re: [Samba] SAMBA implementation for DOS ?
thank you all for answers.
@Ged and Neal,
yes - I considered using DOSBox and/or DOSEMU. This is solution that I will keep away from.
The true is that with DOSBox I dont even need to care about network configuration and there is enough memory to run required application.
The thing is that my Clipper/dBase application is located on Linux server and shared with SAMBA.
8 nodes (PCs/workstations) are connected to that share. If I use DOSbox, then DOSbox node will always overwrite its changes over dBase/database. Which will erase changes done by other nodes.
VirtualBox: as I have written - I have 8 nodes (PCs/workstations). Each of them needs to communicate to Linux/Samba server where application is shared. DOS must have samba client. VB wont help that way.
However I do my tests with FreeDOS inside of VirtualBox.
@Marc - yes, Im playing around that.
So far, on the FreeDOS I have managed to get 485KB of free conventional memory. Application I need to run requires little bit above 500KB.
MS Client take most of it... nightmare :(
One last chance might be NFS client for DOS...
But I was just hoping that there is some old/discontinued Samba project for DOS.
Dnia 8 maja 2013 0:18 Neal Murphy <neal.p.murphy at alum.wpi.edu> napisał(a):
On Tuesday, May 07, 2013 05:57:13 PM G.W. Haywood wrote:
> Hi there,
> On Tue, 7 May 2013 czezz wrote:
> > I use FreeDOS with MS Client to map a network drive. However MS
> > Client is a memory hog and prevents me to run all applications I
> > need. Therefore I would like to ask here is there SAMBA
> > implementation for DOS ?
> Have you considered using DOSBox on a Linux machine? Then you can do
> whatever you want with drives, mapping, NAS, or whatever. I use it a
> lot for an old application that I wrote over twenty years ago, it does
> everything that I need.
> Alternatively you could try VirtualBox, which will let you do similar
> things with drives but I don't know how flexible it is.
To extend this concept a little, mayhap czezz could run each DOS app in a
separate VM or separate DOSBox. Then he wouldn't need to worry about RAM.
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
More information about the samba