[Samba] Using samba4 with AD and rfc2307 - what are the *current* practices?
L.P.H. van Belle
belle at bazuin.nl
Mon Dec 16 07:11:30 MST 2013
Yes, there i reported 2 dependency problems, and sernet fixed them.
only 2 things left is the option to install sssd AND sernet-samba.
If i try that, all sernet-samba is remove.
apt-get install sernet-samba-winbind ( missing net program from sernet-samba packages. )
* sernet-samba should be installed also with sernet-samba-winbind
( same with sernet-samba-ad )
apt-get install sssd sssd-ad sssd-ad-common libndr-standard0 libndr0
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
The following package was automatically installed and is no longer required:
Use 'apt-get autoremove' to remove them.
The following extra packages will be installed:
libipa-hbac0 libsamba-util0 sssd-ipa sssd-krb5 sssd-krb5-common sssd-ldap sssd-proxy
The following packages will be REMOVED:
cifs-utils libwbclient0 sernet-samba sernet-samba-ad sernet-samba-client sernet-samba-common sernet-samba-libs sernet-samba-libsmbclient0 sernet-samba-libwbclient0 sernet-samba-winbind smbfs
The following NEW packages will be installed:
libipa-hbac0 libndr-standard0 libndr0 libsamba-util0 sssd sssd-ad sssd-ad-common sssd-ipa sssd-krb5 sssd-krb5-common sssd-ldap sssd-proxy
0 upgraded, 12 newly installed, 11 to remove and 8 not upgraded.
Need to get 2,976 kB of archives.
After this operation, 42.5 MB disk space will be freed.
Do you want to continue [Y/n]? n
the files libndr-standard0,libndr0, libsamba-util0, are from Candidate: 4.0.0~alpha18.dfsg1-4ubuntu2
maybe sernet can provide these also ?
system used ubuntu 12.04
>Van: bj at SerNet.DE [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org]
>Namens Björn JACKE
>Verzonden: maandag 16 december 2013 13:53
>Aan: Rowland Penny
>CC: samba at lists.samba.org
>Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] Using samba4 with AD and rfc2307 - what
>are the *current* practices?
>On 2013-12-16 at 10:52 +0000 Rowland Penny sent off:
>> Hi, I cannot fully recall all the various problems I had, but it all
>> boiled down to the fact that you rename the various debs so that
>we faced dependency problems like this in the past with the
>3.x packages but
>I'm not aware of any of those problems currently or with the
>In case you should really use our current packages and see
>them back to us. If you prefer compiling your samba release on
>your own, this
>is perfectly fine.
>To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
More information about the samba