[Samba] filesystem of choice?

[Christ Schlacta]

ZFSonLinux is very nearly production ready, and I'm preparing to deploy 
it soon on a home server.  Just a few minor niceties missing for now, 
but all the essential features are in place, and the bugs are only 
trickling in and nothing major's come up in a while.

I'd certainly not trust it to a ~100TB multi server multi SAN 
environment yet, but soon~  zvol has been there from zfs for a while, so 
if you want xfs on ZFS in your environment, that's the closest I'd trust 
it in production yet.

On 6/25/2011 17:48, Charles Weber wrote:
> I have a ~100 TB multi server multi SAN XFS/Samba deployment and have been
> using it since early fedora core days. EXT4 is now where I would consider
> using it instead of XFS. But with XFS and LVM I have trivial and very quick
> formatting, partition resizing and partition duplicating. It has been great.
> I would like some of the ZFS/BTRFS or GFS2 advantages but hey on a UPS, XFS
> just works and it is proven.
>
> On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 4:44 AM, Grant<grantliddle at gmail.com>  wrote:
>
>> On Jun 25, 2011, at 1:32 AM, Christian PERRIER<bubulle at debian.org>  wrote:
>>
>>> Quoting Linda W (samba at tlinx.org):
>>>
>>>> I regret misinforming anyone.
>>> I don't think you did..:-)
>>>
>>> You mentioned xfs as a very well supported FS and we later were
>>> reminded that its support was developed by Jeremy. I think this is
>>> compliant with "XFS is very well supported and one can rely on this
>>> code"...
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>> Thanks everyone for a most interesting and useful thread.
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
>> instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
>>