[Samba] MS Access

Daniel Müller mueller at tropenklinik.de
Thu Jan 13 05:53:19 MST 2011

In my case the performance was still bad. But use a normal windows client as
domain member with a share where the access database
is on. With 20 User there should be no problem. And this should be much
faster than an old W2000.

EDV Daniel Müller

Leitung EDV
Tropenklinik Paul-Lechler-Krankenhaus
Paul-Lechler-Str. 24
72076 Tübingen

Tel.: 07071/206-463, Fax: 07071/206-499
eMail: mueller at tropenklinik.de
Internet: www.tropenklinik.de
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: samba-bounces at lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Im
Auftrag von compdoc
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 13. Januar 2011 13:24
An: samba at lists.samba.org
Betreff: [Samba] MS Access

I need to have a server built and ready to install by this weekend, and I'm
trying to decide whether to use the customer's copy of Windows 2000 Server,
or Ubuntu or Centos. I think Ubuntu would have a newer version of samba.

The problem is, for this one server, about 20 users hammer MS Access
databases all day, and samba seems to have had issues with Access in the
past. Is that still the case?

The old server is dying, and they own Windows 2000 Server so it won't cost
them $$ to continue using the OS, but it cannot take advantage of newer
hardware/technologies, so its slower.

Thanks for any info...

To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba

More information about the samba mailing list