[Samba] Samba 3.5 slow. Help with benchmarks !
live.fx.mail at gmail.com
Sun Mar 14 10:39:42 MDT 2010
Miguel Medalha wrote:
>> I use "socket options" because 99% places in Internet recommends this,
>> no one say about "modern kernels" - really. You are first :) And of
>> this options not give me any visible effect.
> The problem with the information on the Internet is that it persists,
> even if it is no longer correct. So, when you look for information there
> you have to watch *when* was this information produced and whether it
> still applies. And no, I am not the first to say that. If you search
> this mailing list's archives for "socket options" you will find this
> warning countless times: "*Don't use socket options* unless you have a
> very good reason for doing so".
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
I`m about "google search". Most results is about "samba performance tuning"
and contain "socket options" improvements.
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Samba-3.5-slow.-Help-with-benchmarks-%21-tp27894473p27896126.html
Sent from the Samba - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
More information about the samba