[Samba] Will 3.3.x vs 3.2.x

[Gerald (Jerry) Carter]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Jim Shanks wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Jim Shanks wrote:
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> Just a quick question:  Will 3.3.x replace 3.2.x as the production use
>>> branch?  We're still using 3.0.28 and up on our systems and just want to
>>> know if evaluating 3.2 is the right step, or wait for 3.3.
>> We are moving to a 6 month dev cycle on major releases.
>> So yes.  v3.3 will replace 3.2.  When 3.3.0 is released,
>> the v3-2 releases move to maintaince mode just like the 3.0.
>> v3.0 will reach end-of-life on Jul 1, 2009.  We've not decided
>> an EOL date for v3.2 yet.
>>
>>
>> cheers, jerry
> 
> Thanks for the reply and all the hard work Jerry.

Thanks, but I can't really take credit for this stuff.  :-)
I'm just the messenger in this case (as the commit logs
will show).




cheers, jerry
- --
=====================================================================
Samba                                    ------- http://www.samba.org
Likewise Software          ---------  http://www.likewisesoftware.com
"What man is a man who does not make the world better?"      --Balian
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFI5jWdIR7qMdg1EfYRAuBmAJ91CtcsgjzEhZWCwGdJ9VqoeW894gCfbioT
7U6QZJywSTQrCQfVQs4RhyU=
=fxJQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----