[Samba] prexec change between 3.0.24 to 3.0.25

[Gerald (Jerry) Carter]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Christian,

> Steve Langasek later suggested that such "now 
> bogus" configuration options could maybe trigger either
> a warning or a rejection by samba so that users do
> not end up with unexpected behaviour.
> 
> What would be the Samba Team stance on this ?

testparm has historically not been smart enough to make
judgment calls on the validity of string values.
I'd be more than happy to accept a patch that implemented
this in a maintainable fashion (not just hardcoding
checks for sertain parameters).



cheers, jerry
=====================================================================
Samba                                    ------- http://www.samba.org
Centeris                         -----------  http://www.centeris.com
"What man is a man who does not make the world better?"      --Balian
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFGUzxzIR7qMdg1EfYRAk/JAJ47dt4zxq1iLAr8mRY248s7lpHiFACg1sLJ
hu6qxhtPghX2uKY6TY9NCo8=
=Oc6f
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----