[Samba] SAMBA Team - Still no SiSE rpms for 3.0.25c

David C. Rankin drankinatty at suddenlinkmail.com
Sat Aug 25 02:32:18 GMT 2007


John H Terpstra wrote:
> On Friday 24 August 2007 08:57, Volker Lendecke wrote:
>   
>> On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 08:40:33AM -0500, John H Terpstra wrote:
>>     
>>>>     Is anyone still building rpms for SuSE? They used to be built the
>>>> same day of the release, now they are trailing far behind.  Is Lars
>>>> still with opensuse and still building??
>>>>         
>>> I run OpenSUSE 10.2 x86_64 - you can download the RPMS from:
>>> ftp://ftp.primastasys.com/pub/
>>>
>>> Note: To build x86 (32-bit) binaries, just fetch the SRPM file, then
>>> built on your own system by running:
>>>       
>> Alternatively, try ftp.sernet.de.
>>     
>
> Not alternativly - SerNet is the preferred location.
>
> - john T.
>   
John T.

    Why are there different packages being built for SuSE between the
samba.org repo and the ftp.sernet.de repo??? Specifically, here are the
differences:

www.samba.org binaries for SuSE 10.0 not included in sernet.de:

cifs-mount-3.0.25b-1.1.72.i586.rpm
ldapsmb-1.34b-80.1.72.i586.rpm
libmsrpc-3.0.25b-1.1.72.i586.rpm
libmsrpc-devel-3.0.25b-1.1.72.i586.rpm
samba-krb-printing-3.0.25b-1.1.72.i586.rpm
samba-pdb-3.0.25b-1.1.72.i586.rpm
samba-python-3.0.25b-1.1.72.i586.rpm
samba-vscan-0.3.6b-4.12.72.i586.rpm

ftp.sernet.de binaries for SuSE 10.0 not included in the samba.org binaries:

samba3-cifsmount-3.0.25c-33.i586.rpm
samba3-debuginfo-3.0.25c-33.i586.rpm
samba3-doc-3.0.25c-33.i586.rpm
samba3-utils-3.0.25c-33.i586.rpm

    Obviously, the only one that is troublesome is the cifsmount
package. Won't the naming difference screw up the Yast database by
allowing two different versions of cifs to be installed under different
package names?? Or, is Yast smart enough to figure that out?  Just a
curiosity...



More information about the samba mailing list