[Samba] Safe to ignore this message ? -Attempt to bind using schannel without successful serverauth2

Jeremy Allison jra at samba.org
Fri May 19 17:18:58 GMT 2006


On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 01:07:02PM -0400, Paul S wrote:
> OS:  SLES 9
> Samba Version:  3.0.20b-3.4-SUSE
> Server is running in test mode, as a PDC
> 
> I find this message in my log files quite frequently, the majority coming
> from one particluar machine (XP SP2):
> 
> [2006/05/19 10:35:06, 0] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_pipe_bind_req(981)
>  Attempt to bind using schannel without successful serverauth2
> [2006/05/19 10:40:16, 0] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_pipe_bind_req(981)
>  Attempt to bind using schannel without successful serverauth2
> 
> The server seems to function properly so far, thus I am wondering if I can
> safely ignore this message.
> 
> Workstations are able to join the domain and log in.  File sharing seems to
> work well.  The speed and responsiveness of network browsing  is quite
> impressive.  I have no complaints about functionality.
> 
> While researching this message, I found a post on the lists archives (Sun
> Sep 11 18:53:19 GMT 2005, posted by Jeremy Allison) that seems to indicate
> that this message is part of normal operation.
> 
> >I'm starting to think the correct fix is just to raise the debug
> >level of the message in smbd so that people don't get worried by
> >it - it seems to be part of normal operation ....
> 
> If anyone can confirm that this is part of normal operation, or shed some
> light on what this means, I would appreciate it.  We have been using Samba
> 2.2.8a for a few years now, and entries to the log files are very
> infrequent.  Perhaps the newer versions are just more chatty to the log
> files.
> 
> If there is something wrong, I would like to deal with it before I go live
> with the server.

Actually it was a misunderstanding by us of the horror that is schannel
auth :-). This should be fixed in 3.0.23 (I think it was fixed in 3.0.22
also) but the message in itself is usually harmless - the client retries.
But you shouldn't see it with a later release.

Jeremy.


More information about the samba mailing list